Chester Charter:  What, Why, and How

A Charter is a framework for managing roles, responsibilities, and accountability. Items in blue can only be done through the adoption of a Charter.

Considerations

  • How to improve access to government for unaffiliated office seekers?
  • How to improve Voter choice?
  • How to improve accountability?

ISSUE:  Leadership continuity in Board of Selectmen (BOS)

EXAMPLES
  • All three members of BOS resigned in 2023: lost all institutional knowledge
  • Two-year terms too short to do the job well, then have to campaign again
BOS ASKED CHARTER COMMISSION TO CONSIDER
  • Expand BOS to five members
  • Stagger terms
  • Hire a professional Town Administrator or Manager
CHARTER COMMISSION RECOMMENDATIONS
  • Expand BOS to five members
  • Extend to four-year terms
  • Elect all five members at the same time
  • Maximum of three from any one party
  • Hire professional Town Administrator
BENEFITS / NOTES
  • More continuity
  • More expertise
  • More perspectives
  • More voter choice

ISSUE: Government Complexity 

EXAMPLES
  • Increasingly complex technology and society; more State regulations.
  • Town residency required for elected officials reduces potential staff pool
  • Emergencies (COVID and other)
  • Low state and federal grant yield: local taxes must cover expenses
BOS ASKED CHARTER COMMISSION TO CONSIDER
  • Hire professional Town Administrator or Manager
  • Hire other professional staff
CHARTER COMMISSION RECOMMENDATIONS
  • Hire a professional Town Administrator who reports to BOS
  • Expand BOS from three to five members
  • Change from elected to hired staff: Tax Collector, Town Clerk, Treasurer (done last year)
BENEFITS / NOTES
  • More expertise
  • More continuity
  • More accountability
  • Can recruit staff from out of town
  • Can replace staff if not performing

ISSUE:  Engagement / Town Meeting Attendance

EXAMPLES
  • 2,800 registered Voters, but Town Meeting attendance is very low
  • Often just a few voters make decisions for whole town – not representative of town-wide views
BOS ASKED CHARTER COMMISSION TO CONSIDER
  • Shared legislative authority (allow BOS to make some decisions/ordinance adoption without having to call a Town Meeting)
CHARTER COMMISSION RECOMMENDATIONS
  • BOS to have some legislative authority (such as ordinance adoption)
  • Voters can petition to over-ride some BOS decisions via Town Meeting
  • Voters can petition for Special Town Meeting for enactment of ordinances or other action
  • Voters can petition for a referendum on actions properly brought before a Town Meeting – including for adoption of the Annual Town Budget
BENEFITS / NOTES
  • Flexibility for BOS
  • Town Meetings for BIG issues
  • Voter over-ride process

ISSUE: Engagement / Agencies (Boards and Commissions)

EXAMPLES
  • Agencies range from 3 to 12
  • Terms range from 2 to 6 years
  • Some elected, some appointed
  • Challenging to fill vacancies; low attendance
  • Volunteers don’t want to run for office, reducing the candidate pool
  • Difficult for unaffiliated to run for election
  • Candidates often lack needed expertise
  • In last 6 elections – over 80% of elected positions were un-opposed—voters don’t have choice
BOS ASKED CHARTER COMMISSION TO CONSIDER
  • Re-evaluate Board structures and membership
  •  
CHARTER COMMISSION RECOMMENDATIONS
  • Max seven members; no alternates
  • Most Boards to have four-year terms
  • Most Boards to be appointed
  • 3/5 or 4/7 max from any one party

Notable Exceptions:

  • The following will be ELECTED: Board of Selectmen; Financial Accountability Board; Region 4 Board of Education (six-year terms); Chester Board of Education; Registrars of Voters; Justices of Peace (State Statute)
  • Alternates required by State Statute: Zoning Board of Appearls
  •  
BENEFITS / NOTES
  • Simpler
  • Recruit members based on expertise
  • Can replace members if not participating (with safeguards)
  • Enfranchises unaffiliated Voters
  • BOS makes appointments and fills all vacancies

ISSUE: Fiscal Alignment and Accountability

EXAMPLES
  • Improve budgeting processes
  • Improve transparency in processes
  • BOS executive responsibilities are not commensurate with their fiscal authority
  • Most financial transactions require Board of Finance (BOF) approval – BOS cannot appeal to the voters BOF decisions
BOS ASKED CHARTER COMMISSION TO CONSIDER
  • Better align fiscal authorities
  • Improve checks and balances
  • Improve long-range planning

Currently:

  • BOS (three members, elected)
    • Finance Director
  • BOF (six members, plus three alternates, elected)
  •  
CHARTER COMMISSION RECOMMENDATIONS
  • Revised framework for financial management and budget process
  • BOS recommends Annual Town Budget to Financial Accountability Board (FAB) for their review and action
  • FAB recommends Annual Town Budget for Public Hearing and adoption by Town Meeting; selects Auditor; sets mil rate
  • Fiscal Advisory Committee (FAC) prepares long-range plan/budgets for BOS review

Proposed Charter:

  • Board of Selectmen (BOS)
    • Five members, elected
    • Town Administrator & Finance Director
  • Financial Accountability Board (FAB)
    • Five members, elected
  • Fiscal Advisory Committee (FAC)
    • Eight members, specified by Charter
BENEFITS / NOTES
  • Professional financial expertise
  • BOS-FAB checks and balances
  • Revised long-range planning process
  • Specified budget process
  • Mandated transparency
  • Balanced fiscal authority
  • Authority for additional appropriations and use of contingency fund indexed to inflation
  • Voters have final decision if BOS appeals to Town Meeting to over-ride FAB rejection of BOS request for additional appropriations and use of contingency funds

Want to Stay Informed?

Have updates sent directly to your inbox.

Email Subscription Form

This field is for validation purposes and should be left unchanged.