Chester Charter:  What, Why, and How

A Charter is a framework for managing roles, responsibilities, and accountability. Items in blue can only be done through the adoption of a Charter.

Considerations

  • How to improve access to government for unaffiliated office seekers?
  • How to improve Voter choice?
  • How to improve accountability?

ISSUE:  Leadership continuity in Board of Selectmen (BOS)

EXAMPLES
  • All three members of BOS resigned in 2023: lost all institutional knowledge
  • Two-year terms too short to do the job well, then have to campaign again
BOS ASKED CHARTER COMMISSION TO CONSIDER
  • Expand BOS to five members
  • Stagger terms
  • Hire a professional Town Administrator or Manager
CHARTER COMMISSION RECOMMENDATIONS
  • Expand BOS to five members
  • Extend to four-year terms
  • Elect all five members at the same time
  • Maximum of three from any one party
  • Hire professional Town Administrator
BENEFITS / NOTES
  • More continuity
  • More expertise
  • More perspectives
  • More voter choice

ISSUE: Government Complexity 

EXAMPLES
  • Increasingly complex technology and society; more State regulations.
  • Town residency required for elected officials reduces potential staff pool
  • Emergencies (COVID and other)
  • Low state and federal grant yield: local taxes must cover expenses
BOS ASKED CHARTER COMMISSION TO CONSIDER
  • Hire professional Town Administrator or Manager
  • Hire other professional staff
CHARTER COMMISSION RECOMMENDATIONS
  • Hire a professional Town Administrator who reports to BOS
  • Expand BOS from three to five members
  • Change from elected to hired staff: Tax Collector, Town Clerk, Treasurer (done last year)
BENEFITS / NOTES
  • More expertise
  • More continuity
  • More accountability
  • Can recruit staff from out of town
  • Can replace staff if not performing

ISSUE:  Engagement / Town Meeting Attendance

EXAMPLES
  • 2,800 registered Voters, but Town Meeting attendance is very low
  • Often just a few voters make decisions for whole town – not representative of town-wide views
BOS ASKED CHARTER COMMISSION TO CONSIDER
  • Shared legislative authority (allow BOS to make some decisions/ordinance adoption without having to call a Town Meeting)
CHARTER COMMISSION RECOMMENDATIONS
  • BOS to have some legislative authority (such as ordinance adoption)
  • Voters can petition to over-ride some BOS decisions via Town Meeting
  • Voters can petition for Special Town Meeting for enactment of ordinances or other action
  • Voters can petition for a referendum on actions properly brought before a Town Meeting – including for adoption of the Annual Town Budget
BENEFITS / NOTES
  • Flexibility for BOS
  • Town Meetings for BIG issues
  • Voter over-ride process

ISSUE: Engagement / Agencies (Boards and Commissions)

EXAMPLES
  • Agencies range from 3 to 12
  • Terms range from 2 to 6 years
  • Some elected, some appointed
  • Challenging to fill vacancies; low attendance
  • Volunteers don’t want to run for office, reducing the candidate pool
  • Difficult for unaffiliated to run for election
  • Candidates often lack needed expertise
  • In last 6 elections – over 80% of elected positions were un-opposed—voters don’t have choice
BOS ASKED CHARTER COMMISSION TO CONSIDER
  • Re-evaluate Board structures and membership
  •  
CHARTER COMMISSION RECOMMENDATIONS
  • Max seven members; no alternates
  • Most Boards to have four-year terms
  • Most Boards to be appointed
  • 3/5 or 4/7 max from any one party

Notable Exceptions:

  • The following will be ELECTED: Board of Selectmen; Financial Accountability Board; Region 4 Board of Education (six-year terms); Chester Board of Education; Registrars of Voters; Justices of Peace (State Statute)
  • Alternates required by State Statute: Zoning Board of Appeals
  •  
BENEFITS / NOTES
  • Simpler
  • Recruit members based on expertise
  • Can replace members if not participating (with safeguards)
  • Enfranchises unaffiliated Voters
  • BOS makes appointments and fills all vacancies

ISSUE: Fiscal Alignment and Accountability

EXAMPLES
  • Improve budgeting processes
  • Improve transparency in processes
  • BOS executive responsibilities are not commensurate with their fiscal authority
  • Most financial transactions require Board of Finance (BOF) approval – BOS cannot appeal to the voters BOF decisions
BOS ASKED CHARTER COMMISSION TO CONSIDER
  • Better align fiscal authorities
  • Improve checks and balances
  • Improve long-range planning

Currently:

  • BOS (three members, elected)
    • Finance Director
  • BOF (six members, plus three alternates, elected)
  •  
CHARTER COMMISSION RECOMMENDATIONS
  • Revised framework for financial management and budget process
  • BOS recommends Annual Town Budget to Financial Accountability Board (FAB) for their review and action
  • FAB recommends Annual Town Budget for Public Hearing and adoption by Town Meeting; selects Auditor; sets mil rate
  • Fiscal Advisory Committee (FAC) prepares long-range plan/budgets for BOS review

Proposed Charter:

  • Board of Selectmen (BOS)
    • Five members, elected
    • Town Administrator & Finance Director
  • Financial Accountability Board (FAB)
    • Five members, elected
  • Fiscal Advisory Committee (FAC)
    • Eight members, specified by Charter
BENEFITS / NOTES
  • Professional financial expertise
  • BOS-FAB checks and balances
  • Revised long-range planning process
  • Specified budget process
  • Mandated transparency
  • Balanced fiscal authority
  • Authority for additional appropriations and use of contingency fund indexed to inflation
  • Voters have final decision if BOS appeals to Town Meeting to over-ride FAB rejection of BOS request for additional appropriations and use of contingency funds

Want to Stay Informed?

Have updates sent directly to your inbox.