Chester Charter: What, Why, and How
A Charter is a framework for managing roles, responsibilities, and accountability. Items in blue can only be done through the adoption of a Charter.
Considerations
- How to improve access to government for unaffiliated office seekers?
- How to improve Voter choice?
- How to improve accountability?
ISSUE: Leadership continuity in Board of Selectmen (BOS)
EXAMPLES
- All three members of BOS resigned in 2023: lost all institutional knowledge
- Two-year terms too short to do the job well, then have to campaign again
BOS ASKED CHARTER COMMISSION TO CONSIDER
- Expand BOS to five members
- Stagger terms
- Hire a professional Town Administrator or Manager
CHARTER COMMISSION RECOMMENDATIONS
- Expand BOS to five members
- Extend to four-year terms
- Elect all five members at the same time
- Maximum of three from any one party
- Hire professional Town Administrator
BENEFITS / NOTES
- More continuity
- More expertise
- More perspectives
- More voter choice
ISSUE: Government Complexity
EXAMPLES
- Increasingly complex technology and society; more State regulations.
- Town residency required for elected officials reduces potential staff pool
- Emergencies (COVID and other)
- Low state and federal grant yield: local taxes must cover expenses
BOS ASKED CHARTER COMMISSION TO CONSIDER
- Hire professional Town Administrator or Manager
- Hire other professional staff
CHARTER COMMISSION RECOMMENDATIONS
- Hire a professional Town Administrator who reports to BOS
- Expand BOS from three to five members
- Change from elected to hired staff: Tax Collector, Town Clerk, Treasurer (done last year)
BENEFITS / NOTES
- More expertise
- More continuity
- More accountability
- Can recruit staff from out of town
- Can replace staff if not performing
ISSUE: Engagement / Town Meeting Attendance
EXAMPLES
- 2,800 registered Voters, but Town Meeting attendance is very low
- Often just a few voters make decisions for whole town – not representative of town-wide views
BOS ASKED CHARTER COMMISSION TO CONSIDER
- Shared legislative authority (allow BOS to make some decisions/ordinance adoption without having to call a Town Meeting)
CHARTER COMMISSION RECOMMENDATIONS
- BOS to have some legislative authority (such as ordinance adoption)
- Voters can petition to over-ride some BOS decisions via Town Meeting
- Voters can petition for Special Town Meeting for enactment of ordinances or other action
- Voters can petition for a referendum on actions properly brought before a Town Meeting – including for adoption of the Annual Town Budget
BENEFITS / NOTES
- Flexibility for BOS
- Town Meetings for BIG issues
- Voter over-ride process
ISSUE: Engagement / Agencies (Boards and Commissions)
EXAMPLES
- Agencies range from 3 to 12
- Terms range from 2 to 6 years
- Some elected, some appointed
- Challenging to fill vacancies; low attendance
- Volunteers don’t want to run for office, reducing the candidate pool
- Difficult for unaffiliated to run for election
- Candidates often lack needed expertise
- In last 6 elections – over 80% of elected positions were un-opposed—voters don’t have choice
BOS ASKED CHARTER COMMISSION TO CONSIDER
- Re-evaluate Board structures and membership
CHARTER COMMISSION RECOMMENDATIONS
- Max seven members; no alternates
- Most Boards to have four-year terms
- Most Boards to be appointed
- 3/5 or 4/7 max from any one party
Notable Exceptions:
- The following will be ELECTED: Board of Selectmen; Financial Accountability Board; Region 4 Board of Education (six-year terms); Chester Board of Education; Registrars of Voters; Justices of Peace (State Statute)
- Alternates required by State Statute: Zoning Board of Appeals
BENEFITS / NOTES
- Simpler
- Recruit members based on expertise
- Can replace members if not participating (with safeguards)
- Enfranchises unaffiliated Voters
- BOS makes appointments and fills all vacancies
ISSUE: Fiscal Alignment and Accountability
EXAMPLES
- Improve budgeting processes
- Improve transparency in processes
- BOS executive responsibilities are not commensurate with their fiscal authority
- Most financial transactions require Board of Finance (BOF) approval – BOS cannot appeal to the voters BOF decisions
BOS ASKED CHARTER COMMISSION TO CONSIDER
- Better align fiscal authorities
- Improve checks and balances
- Improve long-range planning
Currently:
- BOS (three members, elected)
- Finance Director
- BOF (six members, plus three alternates, elected)
CHARTER COMMISSION RECOMMENDATIONS
- Revised framework for financial management and budget process
- BOS recommends Annual Town Budget to Financial Accountability Board (FAB) for their review and action
- FAB recommends Annual Town Budget for Public Hearing and adoption by Town Meeting; selects Auditor; sets mil rate
- Fiscal Advisory Committee (FAC) prepares long-range plan/budgets for BOS review
Proposed Charter:
- Board of Selectmen (BOS)
- Five members, elected
- Town Administrator & Finance Director
- Financial Accountability Board (FAB)
- Five members, elected
- Fiscal Advisory Committee (FAC)
- Eight members, specified by Charter
BENEFITS / NOTES
- Professional financial expertise
- BOS-FAB checks and balances
- Revised long-range planning process
- Specified budget process
- Mandated transparency
- Balanced fiscal authority
- Authority for additional appropriations and use of contingency fund indexed to inflation
- Voters have final decision if BOS appeals to Town Meeting to over-ride FAB rejection of BOS request for additional appropriations and use of contingency funds
Want to Stay Informed?
Have updates sent directly to your inbox.